A judge in Madrid has been summoned to the complaint presented by the ‘number two’ of the Gürtel , Pablo Crespo , sentenced to 37 and a half years in prison for the first period of activities of the plot corrupt, against the exjuez Baltasar Garzón to him that is accused of “conspiring” with the commissioner a retired Jose Manuel Villarejo the operation against the lattice corrupt led by Francisco Correa and “harm the people’s Party”.
The case went to the Court of Instruction number 50 of Madrid, whose owner Stephen Vega, will consider whether really these two people are involved in the organisation of the police operation, such as is heard in a recording leaked of a conversation he had the excomisario in 2009.
According to the complaint, the excomisario general Information Juan Antonio Gonzalez and that was the head of the Unit of Economic Crime and Fiscal (UDEF) José Luis Olivera, the excomisario Gabriel Fuentes and José Manuel Villarejo would have met one day prior to the filing of the charge of anti-Corruption, that is to say the 5 of August of 2008, for the “construction of the case ‘Gürtel’“.
We constructed a cause ‘ad hoc’
the attorney for Crespo, Miguel Duran, these audios reveal an alleged “conspiracy orchestrated by the exmagistrado Baltasar Garzón, who, along with some commanders of the Police, they built a cause ad hoc with the purpose of harming the people’s Party”. This counsel and other defenses in the case Gürtel have been reported during all the procedure the rules of distribution of the National Audience, were violated to the investigation of the activities of the plot Gürtel recayese in the Central Court of Instruction number 5, which was then heading Garzón.
The judge of Madrid understands that the facts “present characteristics that make presume the possible existence of crime/s of trespass” and that’s why he has given a car in which supports in handling the complaint. Given the fact Maksibet that Garzón was removed from the race in court for this same offence by ordering listen to Strap, Crespo and others investigated with their lawyers while they were in pretrial detention; even if the complaint emphasizes that it has no relation with this fact.
Likewise, the magistrate of Plaza de Castilla requests to the dean of the National court that referred to testimony of the rules of distribution of the Central Courthouse of Instruction in the year 2008, since, according to the complaint, Garzón took “completely unfair, both in a formal dimension (for violating the rules of distribution of the National Audience), as a material (for instructing a cause that had previously been made to him)”.
Justification of the competition
Also remember that the exjuez justified his competence to investigate the case, ‘Gürtel’ in a connection is “weak or non-existent’ with the case ‘BBVA-Privanza’, which at that time was investigating and in which was charged with the ‘brain financial’ network corrupt, Luis Miguel.
The judge Vega has not yet agreed to the summons to Garzón as investigated, or the appearance as witnesses of their own Villarejo, in pretrial detention since a year ago in the case of ‘Tandem’, and the interlocutors in that conversation, as requested by the attorney for Crespo.
